| INDIA NEWS | Companies | Products | Trade offers | Tenders | Trade Shows | EXIM | Travel |
|
|
-
Top stories, latest news, news analysis, business & market news,
City & Industry news from indian News papers at one place. |
|
|
|
India News > National
News |
Serial blasts vitiate the atmosphere The much awaited third round of peace talks between the Centre and ULFA-nominated PCG is all set to begin on June 22, with Government and militant representatives keeping their fingers crossed as the atmosphere for the negotiations has been vitiated by militants who again indulged in subversive activities by causing serial blasts in Assam on June 9 and 10, killing at least six persons and wounding over 70 others. The blasts took place at different places, including the capital city of Guwahati, but their reverberations have been felt as far away as in New Delhi, since they are likely to dent confidence in the peace process with the ULFA. Though no militant outfit has claimed responsibility for the blasts and ULFA has denied its involvement, it is widely believed that these were caused by ULFA. In fact, the state administration almost saw it coming with arrested ULFA leader Mrinal Hazarika telling interrogators that the outfit had planned subversive operations across the state on June 10 and 11. A rattled Dispur has convened a meeting of the Unified Command, which plans and executes counter-insurgency operations in Assam, on Monday, June 12. Officer on special duty to the Chief Minister, Debojit Das, said Tarun Gogoi would hold a high-level meeting, involving senior officials and Ministers, soon after reaching Guwahati on Monday. Gogoi, who is abroad, has been in constant touch with his office and several Ministers, he added. ULFA commander-in-chief Paresh Barua has denied the outfit’s hand in the series of blasts that rocked the state last weekend. In a statement, Barua accused vested interests of masterminding the blasts to derail the peace process and defame the outfit. He pointed to the fact that the blasts had started occurring just before the parleys between the Centre and the People’s Consultative Group (PCG) on June 22. In a statement issued on June 6, ULFA representatives urged the government to immediately stop military operations in Assam and begin direct peace talks with the rebels. The ULFA-constituted PCG, too, issued a communique condemning the blasts. “In the interest of restoration of permanent peace and the success of the ongoing peace process, the PCG appeals to all concerned to restrain themselves from such acts,” said PCG spokesman Arup Borbora. In Calcutta, Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee said he was unaware that the ULFA had laid any preconditions for holding talks with the Centre. Asked whether the ULFA had sought the release of five jailed leaders before opening a dialogue with Delhi, Mukherjee said: “I am not aware of any such precondition. As far as I know, talks are scheduled for June 22.” Assamese writer Indira Goswami, who has been facilitating discussions between the ULFAformed People’s Consultative Group (PCG) and the Centre, told reporters in New Delhi that the Centre was willing to release the leaders to hold direct talks. The ULFA chief had demanded the release of the outfit’s central committee members. PMO withdraws itself from peace talks In another development which is likely to be resented by the militant outfit, the Prime Minister’s Office announced last week that it has decided to “completely” pull itself out of the negotiations. The decision, described as a policy matter, is ostensibly taken to avoid any “overlapping.” New Delhi has cited two reasons for the policy shift. “If the process is handled by the Home Ministry alone, it will put peace parleys on the fast track as it is difficult for Narayanan to be frequently present at the meetings,” an official said. The Centre has also pointed out that there is the possibility of overlapping if both Narayanan and the Home Ministry simultaneously handle the negotiations. Confirming this development, the chief facilitator of the peace process, New Delhi-based writer Mamoni Raisom Goswami, said the Centre conveyed its decision to her recently. She, however, appealed to Narayanan to stay involved in the process. “Narayanan and Home Secretary V.K. Duggal told me about the decision to shift the peace process from the PMO to the home ministry. But I requested Narayanan to stay back because he knows the problem better. He has been handling it from the very beginning,” Goswami told The Telegraph over phone from the capital. National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s pointsman, had been leading the negotiations with the People’s Consultative Group (PCG) constituted by the banned outfit to prepare the ground for a direct dialogue between its leadership and Delhi. The first round of talks was held on October 26 last year. Narayanan led the discussions in the second round with the PCG on February 7 as well, though the Home Ministry was involved this time. The award-winning writer said, Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil was likely to attend the next round of talks. Jailed ULFA families to be freed The Centre on June 8 agreed to release up to 25 children and their mothers who have been languishing in prison since operations were carried out in Bhutan against militants of the Northeast in December 2003. Mamoni Raisom Goswami, the prime negotiator in the peace process between the ULFA and the Centre, made the request for their release to National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan when she called on him. “He agreed. Though no date was discussed, we expect the children to be released soon, along with their mothers,” she said. “There are at least 20 such children in various jails.” The mothers are mostly wives of militants but some are activists themselves. Narayanan also responded positively to the request that jailed ULFA leaders be released before the outfit sends its representative for direct negotiations with Delhi. This is likely to occur after the third round of talks between the People’s Consultative Group (PCG), constituted by the outfit, and the Centre on June 22. Rebati Phukan, a senior member of the PCG, accompanied Goswami. They later called on Union Home Secretary V.K. Duggal, who handed them a letter inviting the PCG for a third round of talks. Meanwhile, Mrinal Hazarika, self-styled commander of ULFA’s crack 28 battalion, said on June 7 his arrest would not be an impediment in the peace process if the Centre was sincere about taking the talks to its logical conclusion. The rebel leader’s comments came a day after the People’s Consultative Group, constituted by the militant outfit to do the spade work for the peace parleys, demanded that jailed executive members of the ULFA be released before the next round of talks. Hazarika told reporters who had gathered at the court premises that ULFA was very sincere about the ongoing peace process. “A breakthrough is possible if the Centre is sincere in resolving the Indo-Assam problem,” the ULFA commander said. PCG seeks bigger role of state government Meanwhile, the ULFA-constituted PCG on June 6 sought a bigger role for the Tarun Gogoi government in the peace talks, arguing that a “proactive” state government would be able to take the process forward at a faster pace. The PCG members met in Guwahati on June 6 to review some recent developments and set the agenda for its next round of discussions - probably the last before ULFA begins a “direct dialogue” - with Delhi. The team of mediators decided to meet the Chief Minister to convey to him the need for Dispur to play a “more effective role”. The PCG is insisting on a better-defined role for Dispur in the peace process, ostensibly because Delhi has not implemented suggestions by the group during its last two rounds of meetings with National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan. The PCG members, who were handpicked by the ULFA leadership to do the spadework for a dialogue on all contentious issues, expressed concern over the lack of “confidence-building measures” such as suspending Army operations and releasing five jailed members of the militant group’s central executive.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||